I caught this article from the Yahoo! News page yesterday and thought it was worth discussing. As a quick summary: the article reports the income of the top ten recording artists of the year.
Here is the rundown of the dollar amounts that each artist earned during 2007.
10. Rod Stewart $59.3M
9. Van Halen $63.8M
8. Celine Dion $82.7M
7. Rascal Flatts $84.2M
6. Tim McGraw $85.3M
5. Miley Cyrus $87.4M
4. Justin Timberlake $95.7M
3. Kenny Chesney $96.2M
2. Josh Groban $104.6M
1. The Police $142.3M
The list breaks down into these basic three categories: the music that older people listen to (Rod Stewart, Celine Dion, The Police), music that very young people listen to (Miley Cyrus, Justin Timberlake) and music that people with small minds listen to (Rascal Flatts, Tim McGraw, Kenny Chesney). Honestly, I have no idea which category Josh Groban fits into since I've never heard any of his music. After a little searching and listening to clips from his albums, I'm still not sure - so I'm just going to ignore him altogether - as I apparently have up until this point. For the argument that I was planning on making, it really doesn't matter anyway.
The point is this, where is the representation of the people of my ilk? The 18-35 year olds with relative intelligence seem to be underrepresented. Or is it that my preferred genre of music, modern rock, is non-existent? Of this list, there is only one band that I would even consider seeing - and I passed. Van Halen was performing at Kansas City's new downtown arena (The Sprint Center, which I have yet to visit) and I decided that I'd rather just stay home then travel the less than two miles distance between my apartment and the arena.
There are only two possible explanations that can reconcile this observation. The first is that people like me, are too busy or poor to attend concerts. They are the college age or early career individuals that are trying to establish themselves and pay off student loans and other debts. The second explanation would be that the state of current music, dominated by corporate radio, is in such poor shape that there are no acts even worth seeing - or conversely, the music that I prefer is crap. I happen to refuse the belief that the music I listen to is crap, because I think it's good. And I am the ultimate judge of what is good and bad. Right?
Here is the rundown of the dollar amounts that each artist earned during 2007.
10. Rod Stewart $59.3M
9. Van Halen $63.8M
8. Celine Dion $82.7M
7. Rascal Flatts $84.2M
6. Tim McGraw $85.3M
5. Miley Cyrus $87.4M
4. Justin Timberlake $95.7M
3. Kenny Chesney $96.2M
2. Josh Groban $104.6M
1. The Police $142.3M
The list breaks down into these basic three categories: the music that older people listen to (Rod Stewart, Celine Dion, The Police), music that very young people listen to (Miley Cyrus, Justin Timberlake) and music that people with small minds listen to (Rascal Flatts, Tim McGraw, Kenny Chesney). Honestly, I have no idea which category Josh Groban fits into since I've never heard any of his music. After a little searching and listening to clips from his albums, I'm still not sure - so I'm just going to ignore him altogether - as I apparently have up until this point. For the argument that I was planning on making, it really doesn't matter anyway.
The point is this, where is the representation of the people of my ilk? The 18-35 year olds with relative intelligence seem to be underrepresented. Or is it that my preferred genre of music, modern rock, is non-existent? Of this list, there is only one band that I would even consider seeing - and I passed. Van Halen was performing at Kansas City's new downtown arena (The Sprint Center, which I have yet to visit) and I decided that I'd rather just stay home then travel the less than two miles distance between my apartment and the arena.
There are only two possible explanations that can reconcile this observation. The first is that people like me, are too busy or poor to attend concerts. They are the college age or early career individuals that are trying to establish themselves and pay off student loans and other debts. The second explanation would be that the state of current music, dominated by corporate radio, is in such poor shape that there are no acts even worth seeing - or conversely, the music that I prefer is crap. I happen to refuse the belief that the music I listen to is crap, because I think it's good. And I am the ultimate judge of what is good and bad. Right?
11 comments:
You have excellent taste in music, darling. It's not our fault that, being musicians, we have a superior ear for what is Good and what is Very Bad (Kenny Chesney? Are they fucking serious?)
I wouldn't have wasted my money seeing Van Halen in their wheelchairs either, but you should have gone to Danzig with me!
Maybe I would have seen Danzig with you... but you wouldn't even speak to me at that point.
Whatever! Just because you only had enough nerve to stare at me like a stalker from down the hallway and leer at me when I wore short skirts doesn't mean I wouldn't have talked to you. And I believe it was I who first talked to you anyway. You wouldn't even invite me into the limo the night of the Christmas party, so there!!
Hey, hey hey, hey. Leer at you like a stalker? Leering maybe, like a stalker... no. It was only like one time, geez.
I tried to talk to you several times, even in the hours before the Christmas party. I thought of inviting you then - "If she'll talk to me, maybe the Christmas party will come up, then maybe I can invite her for the limo ride." So, I tried, I asked if you needed help setting up the table of refreshments for the pre-Christmas party that involved carrying buckets of ice and multitudes of food and drinks out of various offices - a good opportunity to chat. But you wouldn't even say "no", you just shook your head no like I wasn't even worth a vocal response. But still, I tried again, asking if you needed help taking the stuff back to the offices after the pre-Christmas party was complete... and again, just the shaking of the head.
Pre-Christmas party Megan = absolute refusal to speak to Andrew
So, there, yourself!!
If I was shaking my head it was because I was BUSY moving all the food and drink from various offices out to Tim's dissertation party and then back again. You were drinking beer and doing tequila shots in the hallway, for Christ's sake. It was quicker and more efficient to just do everything myself. Not to mention the fact that I was distracted by the severe hand injury sustained in shoving the razor sharp beer bottles down into the bucket of ice. I waited around at the stupid dissertation thing, trying to make eye contact with you, smiling at you, hoping you would invite me to go the Christmas party with you later, but you were too drunk to notice me at all. On top of all that, you just now came into my office and tried to get out of buying me lunch by insisting we not eat anything and instead just "go back to my apartment." God only knows what you have in mind. All I know is, you are buying me lunch!
Point/counterpoint continues...
"BUSY moving all the food and drink" - FALLACY - busy moving cases of beer, one bottle at a time from the office to the hallway - funny how only some of the bottles made it all the way to the ice bucket. I found the stash of empty bottles on your desk in the office.
"You were drinking beer and doing tequila shots in the hallway" - FALLACY - They were shots of bourbon.
"more efficient to just do everything myself" - FALLACY - from part one of this counterpoint- one bottle at a time could not be considered efficient. Accepting someone's help that is capable of opening "heavy" doors would likely increase efficiency dramatically. Someone capable of opening doors would easily be able to carry more than one beer bottle at a time.
"I waited around at the stupid dissertation thing" - FALLACY - waited around from inside the office for everyone to leave, possibly... it would be difficult to make eye contact through a wall. But also easier to slip back out of the office after everyone has left so you could "find all the leftover alcohol a good home".
"you were too drunk to notice me at all" - FALLACY - Who was it that was spotted drooling on the table? Oh wait, that wasn't me... it was you, wasn't it?
"God only knows what you have in mind." - You aren't invited back to my apartment now, but I will have to go back there during the day so I clean up the rotting food from the romantic, gourmet, catered, candlelit meal that I had delivered there so it would be a surprise. Fine, we'll go to that omelet-making restaurant so you can order a cheeseburger again. You win... I guess. Geez.
"Romantic, gourmet, catered, candlelit meal that I had delivered there" - it is 12:53 in the afternoon and broad daylight. The sun is out. "Candlelit?" Please.
"Drooling on the table" - we won't mention who was weaving up and down the hallway, unable to keep his balance.
Actually, I waive my win. You can have it. In the spirit of generosity, I declare you champion of this battle.
I am keeping your soul, however.
I am champion! Finally, a win at something! If I were in possession of my soul, maybe I could feel happiness.
Wait, are you just humoring me?
Bitch, please.
Ok, yeah, so I was going to leave some sorta witty comment about how none of the aforementioned artists are even on my iPod, but I got way to involved in catching up on your "fight". Way more interesting! Sorry for interrupting but I'm totally loving how Megan concluded her argument with "Bitch, please." - that was great! If only some of the political debates would end that way.
I would watch all the political debates if they were remotely as entertaining as "fighting" with Megan. Oh, and you weren't interrupting, she totally ended the fight with the "Bitch, please," comment. Where can it go from there?
Post a Comment